Blog Directory

Sunday, December 30, 2007

the expensive stuff...

Moving, in any capacity, is probably among my top five most dreaded tasks. Having done so four times in the past five years -- eight if you include seasonal relocation consisting of all but furniture -- I've grown to strongly dislike "stuff." My desk consists of some pens in a holder, my printer/copier/fax/scanner, my in-progress book, a lamp, and various designs of "thank-you" cards. I'm a firm believer that the minimalist theory evolved through annual-movers and developed as a result of the ease with which they move.

Moving across the country in a small SUV, which looks something like this,


not withstanding, I've recently grown even more intensely hateful towards objects that serve no practical function. In the course of sorting through some of my more useless belongings, I came across a few that got me thinking; as a self-proclaimed realist that is no stranger to rational thought, I've often observed trends from a distance, allowing myself to fall victim only to those carefully-chosen few that either a) contribute to humanity in a way representative of my agenda, b) come with a minimal or short-term effect, or c) serve some strategic purpose beneficial to my lifestyle. Nike Shox fall into neither "a" nor "b," and "c" would be arguable only when considering that they cover your feet when your run.



These are the aforementioned Nike Shox, my first of five pairs, that I absolutely had to have -- a borderline life or death situation. Surprised that they made it through the four [or eight] moves, I discovered them in a box of college "crap" this afternoon. As they obviously serve no function today, it's almost appalling to think of the sheer obsession Nike was able to create with the lack of supply to meet the demand for a pair of shoes merely boasting four non-functional, molded, spring-like cushions on the heel. Despite being knowledgeable about the shoe's deficiencies -- that the plastic "shox" were poor quality, the original arch was arguably off-set due to the incline of the molded heel, etc. -- I spent many of the weeks in my first quarter at The Ohio State University searching for a red and grey version of the shoe, to match my school colors, of course. Back then, personalization was still a huge deal and Nike had capitalized on it in every way possible: my softball cleats were my school colors with my last name and my jersey number embroidered into them. The Shox line was exactly what Nike needed to redeem itself at a time when Adidas and Puma seriously threatened its livelihood.


Even after searching for so long, both physically and electronically, the only way I was able to get the shoes was to order them on Ebay from a seller in China that charged me three times retail [a bargain as far as I was concerned - at the time] AND it took 2-3 weeks and $50 for shipping.


Maybe it's nothing more than maturity and increasing financial responsibility, but I'm hoping that my Shox serve as a reminder of the things I don't need (and don't want to include in my next move), and of corporate America's power over those willing to succumb...

Saturday, December 29, 2007

Google Maps: Street View - creepy but cool


It's not necessarily new, but it's approaching the effective status: Google Maps' "Street View" feature has currently rolled-out 21 major metropolitan areas -- Denver included. It's slightly awkward to view the cross-streets near your home in a 360-degree moveable photograph, but if that's what it takes for you to find your way, Google can help.
I wasn't able to find when exactly the filming process began, but the corner near my house in Denver already looks extremely dissimilar to the real thing. I suppose the first run at anything will have its flaws, but it will be interesting to see how the growth of the Street View effort effects MapQuest traffic, as well as its own: to my knowledge, it's the only site to offer a photographic view of entire cities, street by street.
Street View - the video is definitely worth watching, regardless of interest in the actual product.

Thursday, December 20, 2007

oh, hollywood.

Photo: Goff / INF

So it's true: Jamie Lynn Spears [Britney's sister, ten years her junior] is pregnant. Per People Magazine, the 16-year-old is 12 weeks along and her long-term boyfriend is the father - none of which I care about, but I'm thorough by nature.

What I am concerned with - more accurately, entertained by - is the potential for quite possibly the most forced stance on teenage pregnancy by a powerhouse media corporation my lifetime will ever see. The tot's television career already has a proven track record; her Nickelodeon show, Zoey 101, is among the station's highest rated as it wraps-up its third season. If you're Nickelodeon, what do you do?

a) Cancel the show immediately in order to protect the brand's image in the eyes of content-controlling parents whose children are loyal to the name, simultaneously risking viewership of those unconcerned with the issue.

b) Rush the filming of the season's conclusion and delay season four until after the baby and its visibility, ultimately treating it as the "personal issue" it's been referred to as, but risking parental concerns with continuing the growth of an inarguably questionable role model for teen girls.

c) Dodge the bullet. At an irrelevent point in the process, cancel the show at the request of Spears, claiming health issues as the overwhelming decision-maker; Spears looks responsible [as much as can be expected given the circumstance] and Nickelodeon shuffles out of its current corner, returning to the respectable social scene.

Personally, I would go with "c" and save face wherever possible: there will remain unavoidable scrutiny, but taking the passive route allows for much more play in circumstantial responses to media without as much risk of the "flip-flop" factor.

I imagine the actual turn-out will fall somewhere between my a-b-c possibilities. I will definitely be keeping up-to-date on responses from Nickelodeon. By the way, I was largely impressed with the immediate statement given to People:

"We respect Jamie Lynn's decision to take responsibility in this sensitive and personal situation. We know this is a very difficult time for her and her family, and our primary concern right now is for Jamie Lynn's well being."

They did a great job of taking the spotlight off of themselves and placing it entirely on Spears; kudos to Nickelodeon's PR department.

On another note, Lynn Spears' (Britney and Jamie Lynn's mother) book deal on Christian parenting has been delayed - shocker.

Monday, December 17, 2007

if i could...

There isn't much I would change about my life, given the chance. However, there is one thing I missed that I wish I hadn't: the greatest music man has ever made.

Don't get me wrong, today's instant availability of unique sounds from each of hundreds of genres makes the life of a music-lover fabulously convenient; it does not, however, provide the raw, anti-corporate spirit of meaningful entertainment that fans enjoyed in the late 60s and early 70s. A live show had the potential to be a life-changing commodity. Now, it's a money-whoring business plan that, when flawlessly executed, gives its guests an overly-scripted, often pre-recorded imitation of talent - with pyro, of course.

I regret the fact that I cannot begin to fathom the phenomenon that was Elton John during his greatest years. Aided only by the actual friction of his endlessly-talented fingers against ivory, he could somehow pack a house - though I wonder how anyone would fit as I imagine his presence alone could fill every square inch of even the largest of rooms. His engaging, energetic performances must have left stunned every town he played; I'm in awe myself of only recorded shows - no atmosphere and merely historical reference can't come close to touching the feeling of being there, in front of quite possibly the most memorable stage presence the time had ever known, as he punched ferociously the keys which assemble timeless classics like "Daniel" and "Saturday Night's Alright for Fighting." To have been a part of a performance that ultimately led to the first "diamond" certified album in history - the Greatest Hits, spanning 1969-1974 - is something I'll never know. Which artist/group today could accurately claim the potential to chart a top 40 every year for 26 years?

There are plenty more wants of mine in this category: Simon and Garfunkel's "The Boxer," anything from James Taylor's 1976 Greatest Hits album, and Meat Loaf's "Heaven Can Wait" are among my most intense desires to hear live. Only I don't want to hear the 2007 concept; I want the real thing, stripped of its accumulated confidence and full of virginity. It can never be the same, and it's the saddest damn truth I know.

The music of my generation is overwhelmingly orchestrated and lacking in pure talent; until this is untrue, I will forever remain envious of those whose lives' soundtracks came before the fall of the single most passionate form of self-expression.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Creative or Ridiculous?

Awesome article by Tug McTighe of American Copywriter:

Article

Monday, December 10, 2007

Where to go when you have nowhere to go.

The Pub on Pearl might be the most underrated night spot I've been to since I became a resident of Denver. Boasting one of the best bartenders I've ever encountered paired with a "locals" scene atmosphere, the arguable hole-in-the-wall is perfect for a strong drink and excellent dialogue.
The specials vary, but if you visit on Thursday, Friday or Saturday, John will make you just about anything you can imagine, and he'll serve it with a smile. With the recent blizzard-ish temperatures, his hot chocolate and coffee concoctions are unreal. Ask him about Cooper and you'll have a new best friend.
The Pub also has pool tables, a full menu until 11pm, and a great view of the game. Check it out at 1101 S. Pearl Street, Denver, Colorado.

Photo: http://www.thepubonpearl.com/

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

from aspen and zachary.

my favorite tots.



Quite possibly the best birthday gifts I've ever received...


There is nothing in the world that can compare to the beauty of a child's innocence.